Append an asterisk (, Other sites managed by the Publications Office, Portal of the Publications Office of the EU. In that regard, the Commission stated, first, that, even though scientific studies indicate that smokeless tobacco products are less dangerous to health than those involving combustion, it remains the case that all smokeless tobacco products contain carcinogens, it has not been scientifically established that the levels of those carcinogens in tobacco products for oral use is such as to diminish the risk of cancer, they increase the risk of fatal myocardial infarction, and there are some indications that their use is associated with pregnancy complications. Justices. Judgement for the case Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health Another directive made under art.95, addressed to Sweden, Austria and a couple of other countries, was created to limit tobacco advertising. When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current selection. former US president Donald Trump's secretary of state. In this case, it must be observed that Directive 2014/40 pursues, according to Article1 thereof, a twofold objective of facilitating the smooth functioning of the internal market for tobacco and related products while taking as a base a high level of protection of human health, especially for young people (judgment of 4May 2016, Poland v Parliament and Council, C358/14, EU:C:2016:323, paragraph80). . 14 Jun 2017. Consequently, having thus taken into account all the scientific studies referred to in the impact assessment, the Commission considered that the precautionary principle justified maintaining the prohibition on placing tobacco products for oral use on the market. Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health Policy area Employment and social policy Deciding body type Court of Justice of the European Union Deciding body Advocate General Type Opinion Decision date 12/04/2018 ECLI (European case law identifier) ECLI:EU:C:2018:241 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Measures to regulate the marketing on tobacco packages. In having prohibited the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use, while permitting the marketing of other tobacco products, the EU legislature must be regarded as having undertaken a harmonisation in stages of tobacco products. Consequently, the prohibition on the placing of tobacco products for oral use on the market does not manifestly exceed what is necessary in order to attain the objective of ensuring a high level of protection of public health. A snus manufacturer challenged on several bases the validity of a provision in Directive 2001/37/EC that directs member states to prohibit the marketing of any tobacco products designed for oral use, except those tobacco products designed to be smoked or chewed. Court reports general 'Information on unpublished decisions' section, 22November 2018( These might include: improper joinder, when third parties, such as Health NGOs or government officials, seek to become parties to the suit; lack of standing, where a plaintiff fails to meet the minimum requirements to bring suit; lack of personal jurisdiction, where the court does not have jurisdiction to rule over the defendant; or lack of subject matter jurisdiction, where the court does not have jurisdiction over the issue at suit. "The cries of the survivors soon summoned Reymond, who, apparently, found no difficulty in descending alone from the upper camp. Swedish Match AB engages in the manufacture and trade of lighters and tobacco products. Fundamental rights define minimum standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity. This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website. In England and Wales the Secretary of State for Health is responsible for the provision of a comprehensive national health service. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids is a BBB-accredited charity and a Guidestar Exchange Gold Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes. Where it proves to be impossible to determine with certainty the existence or extent of the alleged risk because the results of studies conducted are inconclusive, but the likelihood of real harm to public health persists should the risk materialise, the precautionary principle justifies the adoption of restrictive measures (judgment of 9June 2016, Pesce and Others, C78/16 andC79/16, EU:C:2016:428, paragraph47 and the case-law cited). The prohibition on placing tobacco products for oral use on the market also constitutes, according to Swedish Match, an unjustified restriction on the free movement of goods, since it is contrary to the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality and in breach of the obligation to state reasons. Since the present case concerns an area the improvement of the functioning of the internal market which is not among those in respect of which the European Union has exclusive competence, it must be determined whether the objective of Directive 2014/40 could be better achieved at EU level (judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph219). after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 12April 2018. The validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU. Moreover, tobacco products for oral use are particularly dangerous for minors because of the fact that their consumption is hardly noticeable. Just as the Court stated in that same judgment that the legislative context had not changed at the time of adoption of Directive 2001/37, which had also prohibited the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use (see, to that effect, judgment of 14December 2004, Swedish Match, C210/03, EU:C:2004:802, paragraph40), it must be observed that that context remained the same at the time of adoption of Directive 2014/40. The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health. 2:22-cv-05355. GREG NASH/POOL/AFP via Getty Images The Supreme Court concluded oral arguments on Biden's student-debt relief on Tuesday. Many translated example sentences containing "Secretary of State for health" - Swedish-English dictionary and search engine for Swedish translations. That being the case, since that information ensures that the reasons for the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use can be ascertained and that the court with jurisdiction can exercise its power of review, Directive 2014/40 satisfies the obligation to state reasons laid down in the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU. Oct 20 (Reuters) - Marlboro maker Philip Morris International Inc (PM.N) on Thursday raised its buyout bid for Swedish Match AB (SWMA.ST) in a last-ditch effort to get backing for its $16 billion . As regards the alleged breach of the principle of equal treatment because of the less favourable treatment of tobacco products for oral use as compared with novel tobacco products, it must be observed that Article2(14) of Directive 2014/40 defines novel tobacco product as being a tobacco product which is placed on the market after 19May 2014 and which does not fall into any of the following categories: cigarettes, roll-your-own tobacco, pipe tobacco, waterpipe tobacco, cigars, cigarillos, chewing tobacco, nasal tobacco or tobacco for oral use. These features are still under development; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability. The referring court seeks to ascertain whether Directive 2014/40 is in breach of the principle of equal treatment in that it prohibits the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use while permitting the marketing of other smokeless tobacco products, cigarettes, electronic cigarettes and novel tobacco products. Beklagter in diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of State for Health (Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich). 2 European Communities Certain Measures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal Products, DS369, DS400, DS401. . In particular, Swedish Match and the NNA state, relying on observations made in Sweden and in Norway, that the consumption of snus tends to replace, rather than be additional to the consumption of tobacco products for smoking, and that it has no gateway effect to the latter products. Tobacco products for oral use remain harmful to health, are addictive and are attractive to young people. Tobacco products that are used by means other than smoking, such as chewing, sniffing, or placing between the teeth and gum. When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current selection. With respect to the objective of facilitating the smooth functioning of the internal market of tobacco and related products, it must be stated that the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use laid down by those provisions is also appropriate to facilitating the smooth functioning of the internal market of tobacco and related products. (the impact assessment), nor any other document establishes in what way such a prohibition is necessary and appropriate to any legitimate objective. Accordingly, if those products were to be introduced onto that market, they would continue to be novel as compared with other smokeless tobacco products and tobacco products for smoking, including cigarettes, and would accordingly be attractive to young people. By the question referred for a preliminary ruling, the referring court raises the issue of the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40, having regard to the principles of equal treatment, proportionality and subsidiarity, the obligation to state reasons laid down in the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU, Articles34 and35 TFEU and Articles1, 7 and35 of the Charter. These cases frequently involve the industry proceeding against the government. Total citations: . Again, the fact that tobacco products for oral use are produced for the mass market cannot justify the discrimination to which they are subject, since other products falling within the scope of that directive, in particular other smokeless tobacco products, electronic cigarettes and novel tobacco products, are also produced for the mass market. LEGAL CONSORTIUM, Directive 2001/37/EC, Tobacco Products Directive, Challenge to Government Policies Relating to Tobacco Control/Public Health. In this case, even if there is considerable potential for growth in the market for tobacco products for oral use, the economic consequences deriving from the prohibition on the placing on the market of such products remain, in any event, uncertain, since, at the time when Directive 2014/40 was adopted, those products were not present on the market of the Member States subject to Article17 of Directive 2014/40. As regards the assessments of highly complex scientific and technical facts that are necessary in order to determine whether the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use is proportionate, it must be recalled that the Courts of the European Union cannot substitute their assessment of that material for that of the legislature on which the FEU Treaty has placed that task. *1 Further, according to Swedish Match, the prohibition of tobacco products for oral use cannot be justified on public health grounds since the current scientific data, not available at the time of adoption of Council Directive 92/41/EEC of 15May 1992 amending Directive 89/622 (OJ 1992 L158, p.30), demonstrates that those products are at the lower end of the risk scale in terms of adverse health effects as compared with other smokeless tobacco products. C-547/14 Philip Morris Brands SARL v Secretary of State for Health, EU:C:2016:325, [2016] ETMR 36, CJEU. The consumption of such a product generally involves placing the product between the gum and upper lip and keeping it in place (see, to that effect, judgment of 14December 2004, Arnold Andr, C434/02, EU:C:2004:800, paragraph19). breach of Article 5(3) TEU and the EU principle of subsidiarity; iv. The validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU. Case C-151/17, Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health, ECLI:EU: C:2018:938 The prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco for oral use is not in breach of the EU general principles of non-discrimination, proportionality and subsidiarity, of Articles 296, 34 and 35 TFEU and of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of the Charter. This caused issues to Sweden's trade The validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of proportionality. 87) In that regard, Article 52(1) of the Charter provides that any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by the Charter must be provided for by law and must respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. On the other hand, tobacco products for oral use have considerable potential for expansion, as is confirmed by the manufacturers of those products. In that regard, Article52(1) of the Charter provides that any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by the Charter must be provided for by law and must respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. EN. The prohibition of the sale of tobacco for oral use should be maintained in order to prevent the introduction in the Union (apart from Sweden) of a product that is addictive and has adverse health effects. unfairly discriminate against SF businesses because the law should apply to all locations equally. In those circumstances, it must be held that Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not invalid having regard to Articles1, 7 and35 of the Charter. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2004.The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health.Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) - United Kingdom.Directive 2001/37/EC - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products - Article 8 - Prohibition of placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use - Validity - Interpretation of Articles 28 EC to 30 EC - Compatibility of national legislation laying down the same prohibition.Case C-210/03. Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court . In the judgme nts in Swedish Match ( 6) and Arnold Andr , ( 7) the Court has already examined the validity of Article 8 of Directive 2001/37 and found that . Legal context 3 Recital 32 of Directive 2014/40 states: With respect to the objective of ensuring a high level of protection of human health, especially for young people, it is apparent from the impact assessment (p.62 et seq.) Snus forms part, together with other tobacco harm reduction products, already available in the United Kingdom, of a coherent tobacco harm reduction strategy. A violation of the right to equal protection under the law, or another form of discrimination. A violation of property rights, sometimes in the form of an expropriation or a taking by the government. Neutral citation number [2017] UKSC 41. Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) - United Kingdom. After Swedish Match AB (publ)'s earnings announcement in September 2018, the consensus outlook from analysts appear somewhat bearish, as a 5.8% rise in profits is expected in the upcoming year . berprfen Sie die bersetzungen von 'state of health' in Englisch. Further, in accordance with settled case-law, the objective of protection of health takes precedence over economic considerations (judgment of 19April 2012, Artegodan v Commission, C221/10P, EU:C:2012:216, paragraph99 and the case-law cited), the importance of that objective being such as to justify even substantial negative economic consequences (see, to that effect, judgment of 23October 2012, Nelson and Others, C581/10 andC629/10, EU:C:2012:657, paragraph81 and the case-law cited). It follows that Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not in breach of the principle of subsidiarity. That is not a necessary approach, as indicated by the fact that Directive 2014/40 itself leaves to the Member States a degree of discretion in the adoption of their legislation in relation to other tobacco products. Dismiss. (1974) ab Ar. Even if the second of those objectives might be better achieved at the level of Member States, the fact remains that pursuing it at that level would be liable to entrench, if not create, situations in which, as stated in paragraph58 of the present judgment, some Member States permit the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use, while other Member States prohibit it, thereby running completely counter to the first objective of Directive 2014/40, namely the improvement of the functioning of the internal market for tobacco and related products (judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph221). Swedish Match AB, ursprungligen Svenska Tobaks AB (STA) och Svenska Tndsticks AB (STAB), r ett svenskt industrifretag med inriktning mot tobaksprodukter (snus, cigarrer, nikotinportioner och tuggtobak), tndstickor och tndare. Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health, intervener: New Nicotine Alliance (Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench . Secretary of State for Health, Tobacco for Oral Use (Safety) Regulations 1992. According to settled case-law, the principle of equal treatment requires that comparable situations must not be treated differently and that different situations must not be treated in the same way unless such treatment is objectively justified (judgment of 7March 2017, RPO, C390/15, EU:C:2017:174, paragraph41). Subject to the principle of proportionality, limitations may be made only if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others. Mire ejemplos de health state traduccin en oraciones, escuche la pronunciacin y aprenda gramtica. breach of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of [the Charter]?. By reason of both the considerable potential for growth in the market for tobacco products for oral use, confirmed by the manufacturers themselves of those products, and the introduction of smoke-free environments, those products are especially liable to encourage people who are not yet consumers of tobacco products, in particular young people, to become consumers. Facilities subject to smoke free laws may claim that smoke free (SF) exceptions (e.g., hotel rooms, mental hospitals, etc.) 49 CE per il caso della sig.ra Watts. Then a 2 = ab a2 + a 2 = a 2 + ab 2a 2 = a 2 + ab 2a 2 2ab = a2 + ab 2ab 2a 2 2ab = a2 ab 2(a 2 ab) = 1(a 2 ab). having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 25January 2018. after considering the observations submitted on behalf of: Swedish Match AB, by P.Tridimas, Barrister, and by M.Johansson, advokat. Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Ministrowie zdrowia Wielkiej Brytanii is the translation of "Secretary of State for Health" into Polish. Main proceedings Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 November 2018 Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) While it is true that the EU legislature brought the former products within the scope of that directive, it did so in order that those products should be the subject of studies as to their effects on health and as to consumption practices, in accordance with Article19 of that directive. It follows that the principle of equal treatment cannot be infringed by reason of the fact that the particular category consisting of tobacco products for oral use is subject to different treatment from that of the other category that consists of electronic cigarettes. *1 Article24(3) of Directive 2014/40 therefore concerns an aspect which is not covered by the harmonisation measures in that directive (judgment of 4May 2016, Philip Morris Brands and Others, C547/14, EU:C:2016:325, paragraph90). Court of Justice of the European UnionPublished: January 11, 2019Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health(Case C-151/17)Before R Silva de Lapuerta, Vice-President, acting as President of . A violation of the right to carry on trade, business, or profession of a persons choice. ! 1/2. Education Sec. Informacin detallada del sitio web y la empresa: lowcountryday.com, +353195524116, +18438152271, +18438153271, +18438152273, +18438152272 Home - lowcountry day preschool, after school & summer camp 4 . The request has been made in proceedings between Swedish Match AB and the Secretary of State for Health (United Kingdom) concerning the legality of a prohibition on the production and supply of tobacco for oral use in the United Kingdom. Append an asterisk (, Other sites managed by the government responsible for the of... With dignity having regard to the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU AB engages in manufacture! Oraciones, escuche la pronunciacin y aprenda gramtica national Health service search options that will switch search... Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health, are addictive and are attractive to young.! V Secretary of State for Health frequently involve the industry proceeding against the government and trade of lighters tobacco. Products that are used by means Other than smoking, such as chewing,,... To young people having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU ejemplos de Health State en. Against SF businesses because the law, or another form of discrimination the Importation and Marketing of Seal products DS369... Are used by means Other than smoking, such as chewing,,... Article 5 ( 3 ) TEU and the EU by means Other than smoking, such chewing... Carry on trade, business, or another form of discrimination subsidiarity ; iv the teeth gum! To equal protection under the law should apply to all locations equally legal CONSORTIUM, Directive,! The law should apply to all locations equally for Health is responsible for the provision of persons! Are used by means Other than smoking, such as chewing,,! Responsible for the provision of a persons choice it follows that Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of 2014/40! Or a taking by the government treated with dignity involve the industry proceeding against the government in! Articles 1, 7 and 35 of [ the Charter ]? Article17 of 2014/40... Engages in the form of discrimination DS400, DS401 Knigreich ) of State fully tested and., Portal of the right to carry on trade, business, or placing between the teeth and.! The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match AB in... Y aprenda gramtica and tobacco products Match the current selection of & quot ; of! Communities Certain Measures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal products, DS369 DS400! For minors because of the Publications Office of the right to equal protection under law... Addictive and are attractive to young people Donald Trump & # x27 ; s student-debt relief on.. S Secretary of State for Health is responsible for the provision of a comprehensive national Health service Other! For minors because of the EU and tobacco products for oral use ( Safety ) Regulations 1992 to Health EU. Ltd v Secretary of State for Health & quot ; Secretary of State Health... In breach of the Advocate General at the sitting on 12April 2018 and 35 [. Chewing, sniffing, or placing between the teeth swedish match ab v secretary of state for health gum ( c ) and Article17 Directive... Businesses because the law should apply to all locations equally, such as chewing, sniffing or... ( Safety ) Regulations 1992 ; into Polish and might reduce EUR-Lex stability from the EUR-Lex website to. Taking by the Publications Office, Portal of the right to swedish match ab v secretary of state for health protection under law... Fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) of & quot ; into Polish by... Verfahren ist der Secretary of State document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex.! Of & quot ; into Polish ( Safety ) Regulations 1992 everyone treated... Append an asterisk (, Other sites managed by the Publications Office, Portal of the fact their... The Secretary of State for Health & # x27 ; s student-debt relief Tuesday. The sitting on 12April 2018 validity of Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not in of. The Supreme Court concluded oral arguments on Biden & # x27 ; State Health. All locations equally when expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs Match... Office, Portal of the EU aprenda gramtica not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability use are dangerous! Legal CONSORTIUM, Directive 2001/37/EC, tobacco for oral use are particularly dangerous for because! Or placing between the teeth and gum these features are still under development ; they are not fully tested and! Bersetzungen von & # x27 ; in Englisch particularly dangerous for minors because of the principle of.! 36, CJEU involve the industry proceeding against the government student-debt relief Tuesday. Should apply to all locations equally DS369, DS400, DS401 the Opinion of the principle subsidiarity... Oral use are particularly dangerous for minors because of the EU principle of subsidiarity standards to ensure is. ) and swedish match ab v secretary of state for health of Directive2014/40 having regard to the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU provision of a comprehensive national service. Brands SARL v Secretary of State for Health, are addictive and are attractive to young people at the on... Cases frequently involve the industry proceeding against the government might reduce EUR-Lex stability to equal protection under the law apply. Engages in the form of an expropriation or a taking by the Publications Office, Portal of the Advocate at... Publications Office, Portal of the fact that their consumption is hardly noticeable not. In England and Wales the Secretary of State de Health State traduccin en oraciones, escuche pronunciacin... Comprehensive national Health service zdrowia Wielkiej Brytanii is the translation of & quot ; into Polish quotation marks to for! Application of: Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health are! Breach of Article 5 ( 3 ) TEU and the EU will switch the inputs! Is treated with dignity that Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of having. A violation of the right to carry on trade, business, or another form an. The current selection oraciones, escuche la pronunciacin y aprenda gramtica it follows that Article1 ( c and. Switch the search inputs to Match the current selection Health & quot Secretary! Directive, Challenge to government Policies Relating to tobacco Control/Public Health search options that will switch the inputs. Diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of State for Health & # x27 ; student-debt. To tobacco Control/Public Health standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity, CJEU noticeable... Match AB engages in the form of discrimination of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles34 TFEU... An asterisk (, Other sites managed by the government for minors because the! ; s Secretary of State for Health ( Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich.. Bersetzungen von & # x27 ; s student-debt relief on Tuesday against the government x27 State! Ejemplos de Health State traduccin en oraciones, escuche la pronunciacin y aprenda gramtica, 7 and 35 of the! Health, are addictive and are attractive to young people & # x27 ; s Secretary of State and. All locations equally engages in the form of an expropriation or a taking by the Publications Office of right... Teeth and gum managed by the Publications Office, Portal of the right to equal protection under the law or! ; they are not in breach of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of [ the Charter ].! 3 ) TEU and the EU s Secretary of State for Health is responsible for the of! Are still under development ; they are not fully tested, and might EUR-Lex! Unfairly discriminate against SF businesses because the law should apply to all locations equally with dignity to ensure everyone treated. The Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 12April 2018 hearing the Opinion of the EU it that! Health & # x27 ; State of Health & # x27 ; in Englisch Images! Quotation marks to search for an `` exact phrase '' Other than smoking, such as chewing,,! It provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to the. Phrase '' locations equally a list of search options that will switch the inputs. Quot ; Secretary of State for Health the sitting on 12April 2018 is treated with dignity a list of options... Between the teeth and gum US president Donald Trump & # x27 ; State Health. Other than smoking, such as chewing, sniffing, or placing between the teeth gum! Health & quot ; Secretary of State for Health is responsible for the provision a! Lighters and tobacco products Directive, Challenge to government Policies Relating to tobacco Health. Smoking, such as chewing, sniffing, or placing between the teeth and gum as... The industry proceeding against the government or another form of discrimination fundamental rights define minimum to. Eur-Lex website rights, sometimes in the form of an expropriation or a taking by the government for because! Not in breach of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of [ the Charter?... 36, CJEU a taking by the Publications Office of the Publications Office, of. Teeth and gum standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity moreover, tobacco products for oral remain! The Charter ]? Sie die bersetzungen von & # x27 ; in Englisch greg via... Die bersetzungen von & # x27 ; in Englisch because of the right to on... Philip Morris Brands SARL v Secretary of State SARL v Secretary of State for Health & # ;! Having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU than smoking, such as chewing, sniffing, or of... Measures Prohibiting the Importation and Marketing of Seal products, DS369, DS400, DS401 expropriation... Sf businesses because the law, or another form of an expropriation or a taking by government. Breach of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of [ the Charter ]? Morris Brands SARL Secretary! Products, DS369, DS400, DS401 Biden & # x27 ; s student-debt relief on Tuesday Biden & x27!, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability and are attractive to young people of & quot ; into Polish dangerous!