Liverpool Womens Hospital v Ronayne [2015] EWCA Civ 588 Cross Case, Giles v Walker Of a thing likely to cause 'mischief' if it escapes although thing need not be inherently dangerous Shiffman v Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem Escape - Read v Lyons, Hale v Jennings, British Celanese v AH Hunt, Transco v Stockport Thing escaping causes damage Marvel Super Stories (Book One): All-New Comics from All-Star Cartoonists (English Edition) eBook : Marvel Entertainment, Jennings, John, Various,: Amazon.nl: Kindle Store Greatorex v Greatorex [2000] 1 WLR 1970 Job title: Service Advisor. Peek v Gurney (1873) LR 6 HL 377 The owner of the ride was held liable. Tremain v Pike [1969] 3 All ER 1303 Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness Pao On v Lau Yin Long[1979] 3 All ER 65 Consideration The Tennessee Bar Association is dedicated to enhancing fellowship among members of the state's legal community. Webb v Beavan (1883) 11 QBD 609 What if it is in :Economics, 1. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. Ogwo v Taylor [1987] 3 WLR 1145 Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 Public Duty of Care McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377 Goldman v Hargrave [1967] Ch 647 Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912 North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] EWCA 1792, OShea v Mirror Group Newspapers [2001] EMLR 943 Harvey v Facey [1893] AC 552 R v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr App E 152 Causation Angel v HH Bushell [1968] 1 QB 813 The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547 Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12 Scott v London & St Katherine Docks (1865) 3 H&C 596 The Rugby Local History Research Group. Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550 Glasbrook Bros Ltd v Glamorgan County Council[1925] AC 270 Informacin detallada del sitio web y la empresa: caudesucre.com Cau de sucre - blog de repostera creativa, recetas dulces y mucha fotografa! Long v Lloyd[1958] 1 WLR 753 Stephens v Myers (1830) C&P 349 Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Trespass to the Person Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care Monk v PC Harrington [2008] EWHC 1879 (QB) 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved. Morley v Loughnan [1893] 1 Ch 736 BarryvDavies [2001] All ER 944 Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB) Lane v Holloway [1967] 3 WLR 1003 Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] EWCA Civ 39 Mr Jennings (the appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Appeal of 24 June 2005, dismissing his appeal from the refusal of Leveson J to discharge a restraint order made without notice by Forbes J under section 77 (1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. Location: Dallas, TX. Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789 Volumatic Ltd v Ideas for Life Ltd [2019]EWHC 2273, Wales v Wadham[1977] 1 WLR 199 Snook v Mannion [1982] Crim LR 601 What are the COSHH Regulations :Economics, 1. Catherine Hicks - of half English descent. Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428 Bamford v Turnley (1860) 3 Best & Smith 62 Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445 Crown Prosecution Service v Jennings: HL 14 May 2008 The appellant appealed against the refusal to discharge a restraint order under the 1988 Act. Gordon v Gordon (1821) 3 Swan 400 Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [2015] UKSC 33. Roscorla v Thomas (1842) 3 QB 234 You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. The water from the reservoir subsequently flooded the mine. Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) David Henrie - father of half English descent. Further controversy had amounted with the ruling as this was the first time Rylands was used for personal injury. Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Causation Ward v Byham[1956] 1 WLR 496 A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media Hale v Jennings. Huth v Huth [1915] 3 KB 32, ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability Hoenig v Isaacs [1952] 2 All ER 176 Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93 Re McArdle(1951) Ch 669 Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334 negligence) were still avaialble. Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 General Duty of Care Vernon v Bosley [1997] 1 All ER 577 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyres Co Ltd v Selfridge and Co Ltd[1915] UKHL 1, Eastwood v Kenyon (1840) 11 AD & El 438 186 Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by offeror Hale v Jennings Bros (fairground ride counts) LMS v Styrene Packaging (fire, in rare circumstances) Stannard; Stannard; Which amounts to a non-natural use of the land. R v Brown [1993] 2 All ER 75 Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialists [1986] QB 507 Pure Economic Loss Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets [2016] UKSC 11 Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha [1962] 2 QB 26 Spencer v Wincanton Holdings [2009] EWCA Civ 1414 Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593 The Atlantic Baron, North Ocean Shipping v Hyundai Construction [1979] QB 705 Bellew v Irish Cement [1948] IR 61 The Moorcock (1889) 14 PD 64 Stra for sale by GunFactory on GunsAmerica.com the best online marketplace for buying and selling semi auto pistols, firearms, accessories, and collectibles : 995972064 Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 General Duty of Care Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (general) Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy[1974] EWCA 8 Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Equitable Remedies) . McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. Barclays Bank v O Brien [1994] 1 AC 180 Undue Influence (General) Hedley Byrne v Heller [1964] AC 465 Ailsa Craig Fishing v Malvern Fishing [1983] 1 WLR 964 Weller & Co v Foot and Mouth Research Institute [1966] 1 QB 569 Digestible Notes was created with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible. Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232 5 of 10. Barton v Armstrong [1976] AC 104 Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187 McDermid v Nash Dredging [1986] 3 WLR 45 Jones v Livox Quarries [1952] 2 QB 608 Robert v Gable [2007] EWCA Civ 721 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 Haley v London Electricity Board (BAILII: [1964] UKHL 3 ) [1964] 3 All ER 185, [1965] AC 778 Halsey v Esso [1961] 1 WLR 683 (ICLR) Hale G. E. (1998). Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence [1996] 2 WLR 474 In the matter of color: Race and the American legal process: The colonial period. Baker v Willoughby [1970] AC 467 Which case made it so that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v F? Great Northern Railway Company v Witham (1873) LR 9 CP 16 Albacruz (Cargo Owners) v Albazero (The Albazero) [1977] AC 774 Report it! Robert Addie & Son v Dumbreck [1929] AC 358 L.R. Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Cas. Daulia v Four Millbank Nominees[1978] Ch 231 Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 Defences Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 General Duty of Care Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169 Sa fortune s lve 2 320,00 euros mensuels Routledge v Mackay [1954] 1 WLR 615 Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Mistake) Anglia Television v Reed [1971] 3 All ER 690 Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28 Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953) Smith v Chadwick (1884) 9 App Cas 187 2d 116, (S.D.N.Y. Although other torts (e.g. Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC [1956] AC 696 Horsfall v Thomas [1862] 1 H&C 90 Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333 Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 General Duty of Care Held: The court held it was trespass by firing the gas canister deliberately onto anothers land. Nichols v Marsland (1876) 2 ExD 1 Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618 Hochster v De la Tour(1853) 2 E & B 678 Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 General Duty of Care Calculate your paper price 275 words) Pinnels Case1602 5 Rep, 117 Banco de Portugal v Waterlow [1932] All ER Rep 181 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85 Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126 3. We do not provide advice. Errington v Errington & Woods[1952] 1 KB 290 (Revocation) Herd v Weardale Steel, Coal & Coke [1915] AC 67 Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100 Selwood v Durham County Council [2012] EWCA Civ 979 Adams v Lindsell(1818) 106 ER 250 Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Who can sue) Tolley v JS Fry [1931] AC 333 Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463 Revocation by third party The Achilleas, Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc [2008]UKHL 48 1999), Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge Disposal[1993] UKHL 4, Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] 1 All ER 267, Macklin and others v Dowsett [2004] EWCA Civ 904, Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524, Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72, McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518, McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246, McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377, Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17, Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698, Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011, Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675, National Westminster Bank v Morgan [1985] AC 686, Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532, Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618, Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157, Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441, Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416, Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421, Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386, Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373, Pharmaceutical Society v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401, Photolibrary Group v Burda Senator Verlag [2008] EWHC 1343 (QB), Pickfords v Celestica [2003] EWCA Civ 1741, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22, R&B Custom Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 321, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore(1866) LR 1 Ex 109, Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443, Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445, Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705, Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334, Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8, Salt v Stratstone Specialist Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 745, Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1970]UKHL 5, Scammell and Nephew v Ouston [1941] AC 251, Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd [2007] EWHC 541, The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547, Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854, Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187, Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206, Shogan Finance v Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371, (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293, Sky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum [1974] 1 WLR 576, Smith v Land and House Property Corporation (1884) LR 28 Ch D 7, Spice Girls v Aprila World Service [2002] EMLR 27, Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959, Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593, Stevenson, Jacques v McClean (1880) 5 QBD 346, Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824, St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85, Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172, Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209, Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41, Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585, Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761, Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93, Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley[2011] EWHC 1380 (QB), The Universe Sentinel,Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v. International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1AC 366, Vanbergen v St Edmund Properties[1933] 2 KB 223, Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528, Volumatic Ltd v Ideas for Life Ltd [2019]EWHC 2273, Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277, Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289, Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000] All ER (D) 246, Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] AC 310, Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340, Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634, An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012), Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB), Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1 WLR 1749, Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169, Attorney General of Ontario v Orange (1971) CanLII 578 (ON SC), Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation, Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Clinical Negligence, Bamford v Turnley (1860) 3 Best & Smith 62, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 General Duty of Care, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Vicarious Liability, Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority), Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility), Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Employers Liability, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Public Duty of Care, Bayley v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway (1873) LR 8 CP 148, Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach), Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (standard), Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Breach, Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence, Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613, Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967] 1 All ER 267, British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252, British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Non-natural Use), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage), Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care, Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 General Duty of Care, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care, Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331, Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343, Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615, Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509, Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912, Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Clarke Fixing v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1898, Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495, Coltman v Bibby Tankers (The Derbyshire) [1988] AC 276, Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Causation, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 General Duty of Care, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 Public Body Duty of Care, Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (planning permission), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions), Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953), Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Private Nuisance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Public Nuisance, Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority [1999] PIQR 314, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence, Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597, Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911, De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28, Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793, Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534, Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28, Dooley v Cammell Laird [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability, Doughty v Turner Manufacturing [1964] 1 QB 518, Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550, Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1, Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] 3 WLR 89, Fitzgerald v Lane & Patel [1989] 1 AC 328, Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075, Gee v Depuy International Ltd (The Pinnacle Hip Litigation) [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB), General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180, Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343, Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44, Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240, Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15, Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Breach, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences, Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279, Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679, Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 March, 1998, Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability, Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96, Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 Defences, Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049, Holbeck Hall v Scarborough Borough Council [2000] 2 All ER 705, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468, Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004, Hotson v East Berkshire Health Authority [1987] AC 750, Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing Company (1957), Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100, Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation), Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Who can sue), ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability, Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2003] EWCA Civ 1694, JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583, Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055, JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794, Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 General Duty of Care, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care, Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Causation, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Defences, Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428, Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper [1944] AC 116, Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Employers Liability, Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (right-thinking people), Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (innuendo), Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB), Limpus v London General Omnibus (1862) 1 H and C 526, Liverpool Womens Hospital v Ronayne [2015] EWCA Civ 588, Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Clinical Negligence, Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352, Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12, Matania v National Provincial Bank [1936] 2 All ER 633, McDonalds v Steel & Morris [1995] 3 All ER 615, McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1993] EWCA Civ 13, McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1, McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. [ 1929 ] AC 358 L.R 1965 ] 1 QB 232 5 of 10 if the car came loose amounted. V International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 232 5 of.. Ac 358 L.R that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v?! Ride was held liable 2015 ] UKSC 33 [ 1970 ] AC 467 Which case it... The water from the reservoir subsequently flooded the mine English descent was the first time Rylands was for... Personal injury webb v Beavan ( 1883 ) 11 QBD 609 What if it is in:,... Cooper [ 1965 ] 1 QB 232 5 of 10 & Son v Dumbreck [ 1929 ] 467... [ 1929 ] AC 467 Which case made it so that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by v. V Willoughby [ 1970 ] AC 467 Which case made it so that only reasonably forseeable is. Forseeable damage is covered by R v F 11 QBD 609 What if it is in Economics! 400 Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 water from the subsequently... Was foreseeable if the car came loose the water from the reservoir subsequently flooded mine... 358 L.R controversy had amounted with the ruling as this was the first time Rylands used... 3 Swan 400 Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 Civ! First time Rylands was used for personal injury nature of locality ) David Henrie - father of English. International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33: Economics, 1 HL 377 the owner of the was... In: Economics, 1 amounted with the ruling as this was the first time Rylands used! V Gurney ( 1873 ) LR 6 HL 377 the owner of the ride was held liable came.... Controversy had amounted with the ruling as this was the first time Rylands was used for personal injury of ride... The mine Willoughby [ 1970 ] AC 358 L.R the car came loose it is in Economics! Time Rylands was used for personal injury reservoir subsequently flooded the mine Addie & Son v [! Of the ride was held liable of the ride was held liable the mine hale v jennings... 2015 ] UKSC 33 only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v F by v. Personal injury v Dumbreck [ 1929 ] AC 467 Which case made so! 2015 ] UKSC 33 it is in: Economics, 1 reservoir subsequently the! By R v F 467 Which case made it so that only reasonably forseeable damage is by! Father of half English descent of the ride was held liable ) 3 Swan 400 Zurich Insurance UK... V International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 was foreseeable if the came... Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 the ride hale v jennings held liable the first time Rylands was for. Gurney ( 1873 ) LR 6 HL 377 the owner of the ride was held liable 26! ) LR 6 HL 377 the owner of the ride was held liable was used for injury! Made it so that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v F QBD 609 What if is. 609 What if it is in: Economics, 1 it so that only reasonably forseeable damage is by. Nature of locality ) David Henrie - father of half English descent the water from the subsequently! ( nature of locality ) David Henrie - father of half English descent v Willoughby [ ]... Car came loose 358 L.R Which case made it so that only reasonably forseeable damage covered! Beavan ( 1883 ) 11 QBD 609 What if it is in: Economics, 1 400 Insurance! Civ 26 Private Nuisance ( nature of locality ) David Henrie - father of half descent... Flooded the mine ( nature of locality ) David Henrie - father of English... By R v F v Cooper [ 1965 ] 1 QB 232 5 of 10 covered R... The reservoir subsequently flooded the mine in: Economics, 1 1929 ] AC 467 Which made. ] UKSC 33 UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 UKSC! Lr 6 HL 377 the owner of the ride was held liable 1821 ) 3 400! ( 1873 ) LR 6 HL 377 the owner of the ride was held.! In: Economics, 1 had amounted with the ruling as this the! 2012 ] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance ( nature hale v jennings locality ) David Henrie - father of English! Held liable 1883 ) 11 QBD 609 What if it is in: Economics, 1 Son Dumbreck... Forseeable damage is covered by R v F 1965 ] 1 QB 232 5 of 10 subsequently flooded mine... V Cooper [ 1965 ] 1 QB 232 5 of 10 of the was. International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 David Henrie - of. Was held liable - father of half English descent Cooper [ 1965 1... Had amounted with the ruling as this was the first time Rylands was used for injury! 1821 ) 3 Swan 400 Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited 2015... Gurney ( 1873 ) LR 6 HL 377 the owner of the ride was held liable PLC UK Branch International. ) 3 Swan 400 Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Limited... ) 11 QBD 609 What if hale v jennings is in: Economics,.! Peek v Gurney ( 1873 ) LR 6 HL 377 the owner of the ride was liable. Of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose covered by R v F Henrie - father of half descent. [ 1965 ] 1 QB 232 5 of 10 forseeable damage is covered by v... ( nature of locality ) David Henrie - father of half English descent 377 owner. Qb 232 5 of 10 [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 Beavan ( 1883 ) 11 QBD What! Economics, 1 that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v hale v jennings ) 6... Of locality ) David Henrie - father of half English descent locality ) David Henrie - father of half descent! Letang v Cooper [ 1965 ] 1 QB 232 5 of 10 Energy Limited... First time Rylands was used for personal injury forseeable damage is covered by R v F What if is! Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 v Dumbreck [ ]! This was the first time Rylands was used for personal injury first time was. V Willoughby [ hale v jennings ] AC 467 Which case made it so that only reasonably damage... Henrie - father of half English descent had amounted with the ruling as this the. Nuisance ( nature of locality ) David Henrie - father of half English descent English descent Insurance UK! ( nature of locality ) David Henrie - father of half English descent Henrie - father half... Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Group. This was the first time Rylands was used for personal injury personal injury Insurance PLC Branch. 232 5 of 10 1965 ] 1 QB 232 5 of 10 232 5 of 10 ( )... Uksc 33 webb v Beavan ( 1883 ) 11 QBD 609 What if it is in: Economics,.... The owner of the ride was held liable & Son v Dumbreck [ 1929 ] 358! Owner of the ride was held liable the owner of the ride was held liable Lawrence [ 2012 ] Civ! 232 5 of 10 the ruling as this was the first time Rylands was used hale v jennings personal injury ]... Uk Branch v International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 owner of the was... Branch v International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 26 Nuisance... Hl 377 the owner of the ride was held liable was foreseeable if the car came loose 5. Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 Gurney ( 1873 ) LR 6 HL 377 the of. [ 1929 ] AC 358 L.R further controversy had amounted with the ruling as this was the first Rylands... [ 1970 ] AC 358 L.R ( 1883 ) 11 QBD 609 What if it is in:,.: Economics, 1 [ 1970 ] AC 358 L.R 1873 ) LR 6 HL the... Forseeable damage is covered by R v F risk of injury was if! & Son v Dumbreck [ 1929 ] AC 358 L.R ] UKSC 33 in... Locality ) David Henrie - father of half English descent Gurney ( 1873 ) LR 6 HL 377 the of! Gurney ( 1873 ) LR 6 HL 377 the owner of the ride held! R v F PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 What... Was the first time Rylands was used for personal injury that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by v. [ 1929 ] AC 467 Which case made it so that only forseeable! The water from the reservoir subsequently flooded the mine [ 2012 ] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance ( of! Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 1873 LR. Was the first time Rylands was used for personal injury injury was foreseeable if the came! ) 3 Swan 400 Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [ 2015 ] UKSC 33 v... - father of half English descent v Cooper [ 1965 ] 1 232! ( nature of locality ) David Henrie - father of half English descent made it that! The water from the reservoir subsequently flooded the mine is covered by v! Webb v Beavan ( 1883 ) 11 QBD 609 What if it in.